Posts

Showing posts from 2020

BRAND NEW BLOG CONTENT HERE!!!!

Image
Click here to access our new content

Sports massage is NOT just for sports people!!

Image
" Sports Massage ? That's for sports people right?" Short answer...... NO I know I would be confused too. It is called sports massage after all! But believe it or not sports massage can be for anybody. In fact arguably it may be great for problems that sports people don't usually suffer from. "Arh, you mean aches and pains etc?" Well, yes, but not just this.  For example, it can lower stress, according to research done by Cady and Jones in 1997. Stress is linked to lots of health issues from IBS to high blood pressure, increased risk of heart attacks and strokes, hair loss, skin conditions etc. etc. Another effect of sports massage is that it can lower high blood pressure, which is literally a killer but I bet you never thought of going to have a sports massage for high blood pressure now did you? If all this wasn't enough, we continue into further benefits.... Reduces depression and anxiety (Moyer et al

Journal article review of "Comparing Verum and Sham Acupuncture in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"

Image
In today's article we will critically review the following research paper: Comparing Verum and Sham Acupuncture in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis J Kim, SR Kim, H Lee, DH Nam J Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2019 (2019). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6732586/ So what type of evidence is this article? The below image shows where this article ranks in the hierarchy of evidence: So this article comes under the second from the top: Other SR & Meta-Analyses What conclusion is made? The author concluded that " verum acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture for pain relief, improving sleep quality, and reforming general status in FMS post treatment. However, evidence that it reduces fatigue was not found." Are the conclusion’s justified by the data? It would appear that the they are justified due to the meta-analysis analysing 10 randomised controlled trials